RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Successful implementation of stroke rehabilitation guidelines demands high-quality practice standards tailored to targeted sociodemographic contexts. The primary objective is to determine the quality differences in post-stroke rehabilitation practice guidelines (PGs), when comparing high-income countries (HIC) and low or middle-income countries (LMIC). STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We conducted a scoping review of PGs in English or Spanish, published between 2012 and 2021, and providing recommendations on post-stroke rehabilitation. We used Search engines, databases, guideline libraries, gray literature, and references from previous reviews on post-stroke rehabilitation as sources of evidence. Quality assessment of PGs was performed using 6P's, ELSE, IOM, and AGREE II instruments. We evaluated each item using a scale between 0 to 3, based on the confidence of adherence to the standard. For AGREE II, we followed the instruction manual for scoring. At least two reviewers were independently involved in every step of the process. A cloud-based spreadsheet was used to chart data. We compared the results of PGs originating from HIC with those from LMIC. RESULTS: The inclusion criteria were met by 35 documents, which were subjected to evaluation. The study included 21 documents from HIC and 14 from middle-income countries (MIC). No manuscripts from low-income countries were available for inclusion in the study. The quality of PGs from MIC was found to be lower, in terms of methodological rigor and adherence to international recommendations for guidelines development. PGs from both groups of countries failed to include all target audiences and stakeholders (according to the 6P's criteria) and integration of ethical, legal, social, and economic considerations. CONCLUSION: There are gaps in the quality and availability of stroke rehabilitation guidelines worldwide, especially in LMIC. Designing and providing financial support for the implementation of high-quality guidelines will contribute to more effective implementation strategies in stroke rehabilitation programs and lead to improved patient outcomes.
RESUMEN
RESUMEN INTRODUCCIÓN: El delirium es una falla cerebral de origen multifactorial, común, y en ocasiones relacionada con un desenlace fatal. Afecta principalmente a la población hospitalizada mayor de 65 años. La realización de imágenes cerebrales en delirium se encuentra en discusión, porque en la mayoría de los casos no se pone en evidencia una correlación entre los hallazgos de la imagen y la enfermedad. La literatura médica actual muestra que las imágenes de rutina (tomografía o resonancia cerebral) resultan negativas para lesiones agudas hasta en el 94 % de los pacientes que cumplen criterios diagnósticos. En Colombia no hay estudios descriptivos en pacientes que presenten delirium. Por lo anterior, nuestra idea es describir los principales hallazgos radiológicos en imagen cerebral en pacientes con diagnóstico de delirium en urgencias u hospitalización en un hospital de alta complejidad de Bogotá, valorados por el departamento de neurología. MÉTODOS: Se realizó un estudio de corte transversal que incluyó a los pacientes con diagnóstico de delirium atendidos por neurología en hospitalización o urgencias entre octubre del 2015 y octubre del 2016. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 97 pacientes y se realizaron imágenes cerebrales a 79 (81 %). De estos, tan solo en ocho (10 %) se encontró lesión aguda en imágenes cerebrales. En los pacientes que tienen signos de focalización este porcentaje aumentó a tres pacientes (27 %), y en los que no tenían signos de focalización fue de cinco pacientes (7,3 %). CONCLUSIONES: La presencia de lesiones cerebrales agudas en pacientes con delirium es baja. El hecho de tener signos de focalización en el examen aumenta la posibilidad de tener lesiones agudas.
SUMMARY INTRODUCTION: Delirium is a brain failure of multifactorial origin, common and sometimes related to a fatal outcome. It mainly affects hospitalized population over 65 years. Work-up with cerebral images is in discussion, because in most of of the occasions it is not related to the pathology. Current medical literature shows that routine imaging (tomography or brain resonance) are negative for acute injuries in up to 94 % of patients that meets delirium diagnostic criteria. In Colombia there are no descriptive studies in patients with delirium. Therefore, our objective was to describe the main radiological findings in brain imaging in patients diagnosed with delirium in the emergency room or admitted subjects in a high complexity hospital in Bogotá-Colombia, assessed by the department of neurology between October 2015 and October 2016. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was carried out, including all patients diagnosed with delirium treated by neurology in hospitalization or emergencies. RESULTS: This research showed a total of 97 patients diagnosed with delirium; 79 (81 %) had brain images; of these, only 8 (10 %) showed acute injury in brain images, in patients who have signs of focalization this percentage was higher to 3 (27 %) than in those who did not have them 5 (7.3 %). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of acute brain injuries in patients with delirium is low. The fact of having signs of focal injury on examination increases the possibility of having acute injuries.
Asunto(s)
Movilidad en la CiudadRESUMEN
Abstract Introduction: The obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) is usually established using polysomnography (PSG). Most patients diagnosed with this condition receive treatment with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). The conventional approach requires performing a full-night PSG and CPAP titration over a two-night stay in a sleep laboratory, which is costly and may present scheduling difficulties. However, the combined use of polysomnography and CPAP titration in a single night, procedure known as split-night polysomnography (SNPSG), is less-expensive and is a time saving strategy for diagnosis and treatment. Objectives: To characterize the SNPSG studies conducted in the sleep laboratory of the Hospital Universitario Santa Fe de Bogotá (HUFSFB) and assess their performance in the diagnosis and treatment of OSAHS. Materials and methods: Retrospective, observational and longitudinal study performed on a sample of 221 patients. Results: 208 (94.1%) SNPSG studies were compatible with OSAHS. Most cases (54.7%) had a hypopnea apnea index (AHI) ≥30. Adequate CPAP titration was achieved in 78% of patients who had severe AHI (p=0.00). Conclusions: OSAHS was diagnosed and an adequate CPAP titration was achieved in most of the SNPSG studies of the analyzed sample.
Resumen Introducción. El diagnóstico del síndrome de apnea/hipopnea obstructiva del sueño (SAHOS) se realiza mediante estudio de polisomnografía (PSG) y la mayoría de los pacientes con este diagnóstico recibe tratamiento con presión aérea positiva continua (CPAP). Este abordaje convencional requiere dos estudios de PSG: uno diagnóstico y otro de titulación. El uso combinado de PSG diagnóstica y de titulación en una sola noche, conocido como noche partida (PSGNP), es una alternativa diagnóstica y terapéutica válida que optimiza la utilización de tiempo y recursos. Objetivo. Caracterizar los estudios de PSGNP realizados en el laboratorio de sueño del Hospital Universitario de la Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá (HUFSFB) y evaluar su desempeño. Materiales y métodos. Se realizó un estudio observacional analítico de tipo longitudinal retrospectivo de una muestra de 221 pacientes. Resultados. Se registraron 208 (94.1%) estudios de PSGNP compatibles con SAHOS, de los cuales la mayoría de los pacientes (54.7%) presentaron un índice de apnea hipopnea (IAH) >30. En 78% de los pacientes que presentaban IAH severo se logró una titulación adecuada del CPAP (p=0.00). Conclusiones. En la mayor parte de los estudios de PSGNP de la muestra analizada se diagnosticó SAHOS y se consiguió una titulación adecuada del CPAP.
